Sunday, September 30, 2012

RR #11 Brandt


Reading Response #11: Brandt

Summary

            With “Sponsors of Literacy” Deborah Brandt insists that literacy isn’t something one achieves on their own; rather that literacy is sponsored by a variety of entities–be it people, schools or a specific set of circumstances. However, while these sponsors enable people to become literate, Brandt insists that this does NOT mean these sponsors are selfless or altruistic. In fact, Brandt notes, sponsors usually are entirely self-interested.

Pre-Reading

            You see promotional material for reading everywhere. Teachers encourage it, to the point where they’re practically shoving it down your throat. Parents encourage it, even if they’ve discontinued leisure reading entirely. The value of being literate is immeasurable. That’s why it’s so heavily emphasized. There are posters hanging in the hallways of every school. The library has all sorts of promotional contests to encourage the youth to read. Being literate is crucially important in today’s society. You’re affected vocationally, socially, economically.

Synthesis

            “Sponsors of Literacy” reminded me once again of Greene’s parlor metaphor, though it was Stuart Greene who created it. You sit for a while and absorb. You take in as much knowledge as you can. Then you begin to formulate independent (as independent as it can be) thought and from there you go on and contribute to the conversation. Eventually, someone else will enter the parlor and the process will repeat itself. It’s very cyclical. I think sponsors are cyclical too. Millions and millions of children go to school or watch TV and gain an understanding of the English language. Eventually they go on to stand in front of those same chalkboards and cameras, and another couple million children absorb what’s being thrown at them.


Questions for Discussion and Journaling

1) Brandt describes literary sponsors as “any agents, local or distant, concrete or abstract, who enable, support, teach, model, as well as recruit, regulate, suppress, or withhold literacy–and gain advantage by it in some way.” Literary sponsors are the organizations, people, websites, entities you interact with that shape your literacy in ways similar to other establishments, and in ways different to other establishments.

Applying and Exploring Ideas

2) I’ve definitely encountered both the withholding of literacies and the overbearing encouragement (forcing) of literacies while I was in high school. We weren’t offered books like The Catcher in The Rye and In Cold Blood. I recognized that these were both very important and beneficial literary works and I regarded them as necessary. Eventually I did end up reading ICB, though not for any academic endeavor. Other novels, such as To Kill A Mockingbird, were required reading for every high school sophomore. A really beneficial class I took while in high school was a course called Best Sellers. In that class, we’d read books that interested us and write about them. That was it. I found it greatly satisfying.

Personal Opinion

            I really liked the idea that all literacy is sponsored, and not for entirely selfless reasons. I’m not sure if I like it as much as I’m interested by it. It’s very cynical, this idea that literacy is given to the youth for economic reasons, for capitalism, for the prosperity of a nation. But at the same time it makes sense, and is very necessary. It really does hammer down the idea that nothing is independent–that true intellectual independence is simply mythical in today’s society.

No comments:

Post a Comment