Thursday, November 29, 2012

RR #24 Anzaldua


Summary

            With “Tlilli Tlapalli: The Path of the Red and Black Ink” Gloria Anzaldua stresses the importance of identity in writing. Anzaldua’s writing is then analyzed and dissected by Andrea Lunsford. Through Lunsford, Anzaldua reveals that writers should write without restraint, with freedom and narrative. If all writers chose to write freely, Anzaldua argues “White Writing” would become less and less prevalent.

Synthesis

            This article shares commonalities with the other readings concerned with identity that we’ve discussed. Facets of identity are explored. Various types of identity are explored. Cixous focused on gender, as did Alexander. Gee and Wardle examined discourse identity. That is the common thread.

Applying and Exploring Ideas

1. “The aesthetic of virtuosity, art typical of Western European cultures, attempts to manage the energies of its own internal system such as conflicts, harmonies, resolutions, and balances. It bears the presences of qualities and internal meanings. It is dedicated to the validation of itself” (221). This is what I think best explains Anzaldua’s take on Western Art.  I believe that art is becoming more and more of an individualistic process, but I am only largely familiar with American culture, and British culture peripherally. I’m not sure if individuality speaks to or means. I feel like communities have been strengthened and grow and grow as technology evolves. I cannot say.

2. The way Anzaldua writes is intentional. It is there to strengthen her argument. If she had written this article clinically, or at least with a suppressed voice, her point would’ve come off as theoretical or suggestive. With the use of individual voice, she’s able to substantiate her promotion of individuality.

Personal Response

            This article was all right. Voice will always be interesting to me. I don’t know. It gets hard to carry on for so long. It was smart of Anzaldua to channel her argument through her own voice. It makes the article far more convincing. If this had been straightforward and objective, it would’ve been much harder to stomach.

No comments:

Post a Comment